3 ms·

Understand, I am well aware of the facts and figures of the East's struggle. I have sat and talked with nearly 50 WWII vets at length, and not one of them from

Understand, I am well aware of the facts and figures of the East's struggle. I have sat and talked with nearly 50 WWII vets at length, and not one of them from anywhere but the US, Britain, and Germany. The road to victory that Mother Russia took is informative when considering the events of the present.

brudgers 12y ago
As I was writing, I refrained from referring to the the theatre as 'Eastern'. The term tends to turn encourage us to turn our backs on the way in which the Second World War shapes the politics of China and Korea [or Koreas] and the way in which the US interprets them. China was the first of 'the Allies'. It went to war with Japan in July 1937 - more than two years before France and Britain against Germany and four years before the rest of the Allies engaged Japan, i.e. China fought against Japan alone for longer than as one of 'The Allies'. Rana Mintner's Forgotten Ally was on the new shelf a few months ago at the public library: http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Ally-China%C2%92s-World-1937-1945/dp/061889425X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1401370700&sr=8-2&keywords=china+second+world+war http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Ally-China%C2%92s-World-1937... More recently I read Bruce Cummings The Korean War: A History. Now I no longer write North Korea's actions off as crazy. That's the country whose founders fought Japanese imperialism before and throughout the war. The American military maintained Japan's administrative structure in the South when it 'established itself' their following Japan's defeat. South Korea has had foreign troops in it continuously since 1895. North Korea sees that as problematic. http://www.amazon.com/The-Korean-War-History-Chronicles/dp/081297896X/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1401370140&sr=8-7&keywords=korean+war http://www.amazon.com/The-Korean-War-History-Chronicles/dp/0...

brudgers 12y ago

As I was writing, I refrained from referring to the the theatre as 'Eastern'. The term tends to turn encourage us to turn our backs on the way in which the Second World War shapes the politics of China and Korea [or Koreas] and the way in which the US interprets them. China was the first of 'the Allies'. It went to war with Japan in July 1937 - more than two years before France and Britain against Germany and four years before the rest of the Allies engaged Japan, i.e. China fought against Japan alone for longer than as one of 'The Allies'. Rana Mintner's Forgotten Ally was on the new shelf a few months ago at the public library: http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Ally-China%C2%92s-World-1937-1945/dp/061889425X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1401370700&sr=8-2&keywords=china+second+world+war http://www.amazon.com/Forgotten-Ally-China%C2%92s-World-1937... More recently I read Bruce Cummings The Korean War: A History. Now I no longer write North Korea's actions off as crazy. That's the country whose founders fought Japanese imperialism before and throughout the war. The American military maintained Japan's administrative structure in the South when it 'established itself' their following Japan's defeat. South Korea has had foreign troops in it continuously since 1895. North Korea sees that as problematic. http://www.amazon.com/The-Korean-War-History-Chronicles/dp/081297896X/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&qid=1401370140&sr=8-7&keywords=korean+war http://www.amazon.com/The-Korean-War-History-Chronicles/dp/0...