3 ms·
Wouldn't they just have to published a signed message stating that the change was not theirs and the key is compromised? Or better yet, revoke the key? If two
by ColinDabritz 12y ago
Wouldn't they just have to published a signed message stating that the change was not theirs and the key is compromised? Or better yet, revoke the key?
If two groups with opposing messages control the key, it's pretty clear that the key is compromised in some manner.
- monokrome 12y agoNo, because the suggested "hackers" have published a signed message.
- hamburglar 12y agoDoesn't matter. Publish another message signed with the same key saying "this key is compromised."
- jcrawfordor 12y ago> If two groups with opposing messages control the key, it's pretty clear that the key is compromised in some manner.
- tghw 12y agoIf 7.2 is part of the hoax, then they would be signing with a compromised key. This would be evidence, but would not be conclusive.