3 ms·
I don't believe people are actually confounded by this acquisition. The headphones are wildly profitable and the Beats brand is incredibly strong. This deal is
by achompas 12y ago
I don't believe people are actually confounded by this acquisition. The headphones are wildly profitable and the Beats brand is incredibly strong. This deal is easily justifiable.
- nostromo 12y agoJust grabbing some headlines from Google News: http://www.cnet.com/news/why-does-apple-want-beats-no-one-really-seems-to-know/ http://www.cnet.com/news/why-does-apple-want-beats-no-one-re... > analysts are puzzled by the choice http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-reaction-apple-3-2-billion-bid-beats-20140509-story.html http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-reaction... > We are struggling to see the rationale behind this move http://business.financialpost.com/2014/05/12/apple-inc-beats-tim-cook-innovation/?__lsa=a6d6-b38c http://business.financialpost.com/2014/05/12/apple-inc-beats... > It’s a head scratcher http://www.bbc.com/news/business-27336863 http://www.bbc.com/news/business-27336863 > This is really puzzling... They must have something hidden under the hood
- gutnor 12y agoSeems like those days, if they haven't received press release and a press package the only thing analyst can say is that they are puzzled. Thankfully in a few weeks it will be time for the annual batch of rumour about the next iPhone. That has been almost a year since the last article predicting the 5in iPhone and the iWatch.
- achompas 12y agoThe second article says it all: these are initial reactions. I believe the sentiment has changed drastically since the deal's first announcement (at least it has among sites and blogs I frequent).
- smackfu 12y agoIf it was company X that was doing the acquisition, no one would care too much. It's the Apple involvement that makes it confounding, since Apple doesn't do acquisitions of this sort. They don't buy brands, they buy tech or people.