3 ms·
> Just that linking is way more reliable. Why? Is not linking somehow unreliable? You can't have it both ways. Either it is stable, or it is not.
by rlpb 12y ago
> Just that linking is way more reliable.
Why? Is not linking somehow unreliable? You can't have it both ways. Either it is stable, or it is not.
- bkor 12y agoDon't put words into my mouth to win an argument. I'm saying that linking to a function is more reliable than copy/pasting that stuff into your program. If you want to argue that copy/pasting is totally fine, go ahead. I'm sure enough people will respond to that :-P