2 ms·
Allowing him to present your team as his company puts him in control with the client: he'll get more credibility with the client and he will probably be the mai
by shock 12y ago
Allowing him to present your team as his company puts him in control with the client: he'll get more credibility with the client and he will probably be the main communication conduit with the client. If it were me I wouldn't do it: the same way he is misrepresenting himself in front of the client he could be misrepresenting the client's wishes in front of you. From what you wrote it's seems pretty clear that he sees a clear distinction between his interests and your team's interests and I'm pretty sure he'll be looking after his interests primarily.
Let's say you agree to his wish. What's in it for you? A promise for more projects in the future? Maybe, as long as you agree to present yourselves as his company. The only reason I see why you would agree to his wish is fear (of loss) and there's something I learned with great pain: when I act out of fear, I end up regretting it.
Then there's the fact that by agreeing with his wish you would essentially be lying. I read an essay on NH a couple of months back about an entrepreneur that had a golden rule: never lie! His reason for adopting this rule was that by lying you are telling your brain that things are different than they are in reality and so your brain starts operating with false assumptions and soon enough your thought patterns adapt to the lies and you disconnect from reality in various ways. After the disconnect occurs your brain cannot offer you solutions to the problems you face in reality because it has accepted the fake reality you've presented to it (the one created by the lies). That's it in a gist. Here's the link[0].
Best of luck!
[0] http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/the-surprisingly-large-cost-of-telling-small-lies/ http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/11/the-surprisingly-la...
- mindcrime 12y agoAllowing him to present your team as his company puts him in control with the client <snip> ... he will probably be the main communication conduit with the client. That's probably the case anyway. Client A hires Agency Z to do project Q, then Agency Z subcontracts (some or all) of the work to Team D. Agency Z is always going to be the primary interface to the Client anyway in a situation like that. If he's got the pipeline and can bring work in, and Team D doesn't have the sales/marketing mojo to bring in work on their own, they might as well just go along with it. That said, I'd encourage them to look for ways to break their strict dependence on this one intermediary... I've seen Bad Things happen when a company overly depends on one customer and then that customer goes away for whatever reason. Building a sales funnel and getting deals takes time, especially starting from scratch.