4 ms·
I believe the hatred for systemd has a few sources. 1) The first round was. This guy wrote pulseaudio! 2) This goes against the Unix philosophy 3) Systemd is
by baldfat 12y ago
I believe the hatred for systemd has a few sources.
1) The first round was. This guy wrote pulseaudio!
2) This goes against the Unix philosophy
3) Systemd is taking over everything. Why replace init?
- josteink 12y ago2) This goes against the Unix philosophy Just like ZFS, Btrfs and SANs and cloud-systems in general. And they are really suffering in popularity for these terrible violations, eh? After having fooled around with it, my only complaint as far as systemd goes is software needlessly making it a dependency. systemd itself is just fine.
- pgeorgi 12y agoI remember ZFS being lambasted for its "layering violations" a lot. Also SMF for its binary formats. Now there's btrfs with the same type of "layering violations" and systemd ('s ecosystem) using binary formats. What's good for the goose, ...
- matthewmacleod 12y ago1) The first round was. This guy wrote pulse audio! No argument there. 2) This goes against the Unix philosophy Not a valid argument, nor true. 3) Systemd is taking over everything. Why replace init? We all know what the problems with traditional init systems are, and they have to be replaced. Systemd currently appears to be the favourite option.