And that probably ties a great deal into wealth disparity in the first place, wealth being highly correlated with power as it is. Is it worth it, if everyone is

And that probably ties a great deal into wealth disparity in the first place, wealth being highly correlated with power as it is. Is it worth it, if everyone is affluent with plenty of leisure time and in good health, if a small fraction of a percent of the population control over half the wealth and means of production? Would such a society be stable?