3 ms·
I thought I was alone. I also stopped trying to convert people to Python 3. It is a much better language. By this point, it should be obvious. After taking it f
by sergiosgc 12y ago
I thought I was alone. I also stopped trying to convert people to Python 3. It is a much better language. By this point, it should be obvious. After taking it for a test lap, and after cursing at forgetting parenthesis on print for the hundredth time, you get it. Anyone who uses python and, by this time, hasn't taken python 3 for a test run isn't worth my advocacy time.
- adamc 12y agoI don't think it's a question of test runs. For most of us, it's a question of waiting for various libraries to be ported.
- pekk 12y agoHow do you know what "most of us" think?
- collyw 12y agospeaks to people, reads forums, participates in conversations like this.... When I have seen people talking about sticking with Python 2, its either because A) why bother I don't need to B) a specific library is not Python 3 yet.
- pekk 12y agoSelective hearing has not provided the other side of the story. Because it's not true at all that everyone or even a clear majority agrees with the viewpoint you've expressed
- kazagistar 12y agoThe porting is not that hard. Almost every library which isn't ported at this point is probably legacy, depreciated for something significantly better, or abandoned.
- collyw 12y agoYou say it is a much better language. I see very little difference between the two.. With the exception of exceptions, and print I think all the changes must be to language features I don't know about / use.