4 ms·
How about "underling/overlord" or "dictator/subjugant" or "enforcer/oppressed"? What about "worker/parasite"? Mayhap "strongman/peasant" or "oligarch/human rig
by cheekyAndFun 12y ago
How about "underling/overlord" or "dictator/subjugant" or "enforcer/oppressed"? What about "worker/parasite"?
Mayhap "strongman/peasant" or "oligarch/human rights violation"?
I know, let's all use "duckspeaker/thoughtcriminal"!
- tragicAndCruel 12y ago> dictator/subjugant Actually, I think "exigent/subjugant" would make a better pairing.
- JetSpiegel 12y ago- Offensive to underlings -Offensive to people that lived in dictatorships -Offensive to oppressed people -Offensive to insects, or Social Security beneficiaries, you are politically correct AND recognize that words can have multiple meanings -Offensive to farmworkers -Offensive to people whose human rights were violated (eg US Citizens, Iraqis, etc) -Offensive to former USSR residents, if you go beyond multiple word meanings into allegory
- MyGod 12y agoI disagree with "duckspeaker/thoughtcriminal". IMO in newspeak we should use more doublespeak and use "duckspeaker/duckspeaker" to make it more clear.