The discussion seems to be drifting into the positives and negatives of the morality of the technique without discussing the rather more important critique of o

The discussion seems to be drifting into the positives and negatives of the morality of the technique without discussing the rather more important critique of one-size-fits-all techniques, pounding down any nail that stands up, and shoving every peg thru the round hole, no matter if round or square. If a school is trying to do something good, giving them an evil tool doesn't matter, and if they're trying to do something evil, then the presence or absence of tools isn't going to matter much.