3 ms·
Yes, I see this side of it. It's certainly important to question the uses and effectiveness of techniques - monitoring or otherwise. My problem with the narrat
by Jormundir 12y ago
Yes, I see this side of it. It's certainly important to question the uses and effectiveness of techniques - monitoring or otherwise.
My problem with the narrative of the comments in this thread is that they seem to be paranoid, and they have tunnel vision about CourseSmart, while making claims that will rule out all of the effective new ed tech platforms coming out.
Just look at something like Newton, they monitor your performance like crazy, but they do it in order to make your personal curriculum much more effective for you. Getting outraged about monitoring doesn't even really make sense. We monitor everything these days as an effective way to improve our products, now when a school does it some huge line is crossed? Don't you want our education system to improve? Shouldn't they be trying to improve in the same effective way we improve websites? You monitor user interaction and make adjustments based on that data.
- couchand 12y agoUser interaction is monitored (almost always relatively anonymously) to discover the ways a website can more closely align with users' mental models. The individual monitoring here seems to be done to discover failings in the user, rather than failings in the delivery. That's a significantly bigger intrusion.
- gress 12y agoYour argument seems to be twofold: 1. Because there is already a lot of monitoring, there is no need to be concerned about adding more, even of people who have no power to opt out of it. 2. Effectiveness at achieving the stated goals is everything, regardless of the side effects.