8 ms·
Google updates logo, moves 'g' and 'l' by one pixel each
- yefim 12y agoWho cares?
- scottyallen 12y agoClearly someone at Google does:) In fact, I almost guarantee this change had multiple people involved, and probably at least several internal discussions. Source: Used to work on the team responsible for the webserver that serves the Google homepage.
- noir_lord 12y ago> In fact, I almost guarantee this change had multiple people involved, and probably at least several internal discussions. You just described Hell to me.
- fredley 12y agoI made a gif for easy comparison: http://i.imgur.com/ltqwgvL.gif http://i.imgur.com/ltqwgvL.gif
- KevinCostner 12y ago...back, and to the left. ...back, and to the left. ...back, and to the left.
- regularfry 12y agoWho noticed, how and why?
- fredley 12y agoI imagine the updated url was noticed. Decrement the last number in the url to see older images, e.g. https://www.google.com/images/srpr/logo1w.png https://www.google.com/images/srpr/logo1w.png
- Theodores 12y ago“I was working on the proof of one of my poems all the morning, and took out a comma. In the afternoon I put it back again.”
- pearjuice 12y agoSomeone got paid far above minimum wage to do this. I am not saying it is not deserved just that some people move graphics a pixel a month and tank $300K starting. Others work their asses off physically and maybe make 1/10th of that at their peek.
- krapp 12y agoTo be fair, I doubt whoever did this has "pixel adjuster" as their primary job description. Although maybe for some reason it's a highly complex and non-trivial affair at Google.
- hrktb 12y agoSome people are paid very well to correct typos, or move text and pictures on a page. You can say it's a bullshit job, or recognize it's a different matter when you're working day in day out on newspapers printing at lots of thousands a day for instance.
- Kiro 12y agoI like the old logo better.
- cliveowen 12y agoI don't know what is it, but this new one just feels wrong. I hope they change their mind before it's too late.
- darsham 12y agoThe descriptions are wrong, the letters were moved right not left. Anyways, the new one is more balanced. Quite the zen garden.
- nnq 12y agoLet me guess, a new OCD-suffering designer has joined the team? :)
- r721 12y agoI think this guess from /r/typography/ is worthy to consider: "My educated guess is that it most likely scales in Webkit better. I can only imagine this change was the result of a dozen round table discussions and half a year of a/b testing. EDIT: Yup! Here's both logos at 50%, scaling done by Chrome. Notice how the letter l changes [1] [1]: http://i.imgur.com/x6K1yVe.png http://i.imgur.com/x6K1yVe.png " http://www.reddit.com/r/typography/comments/26fgq6/google_updated_their_logo_they_moved_the/chqk2a7 http://www.reddit.com/r/typography/comments/26fgq6/google_up...
- dvirsky 12y ago> I can only imagine this change was the result of a dozen round table discussions and half a year of a/b testing I really hope not...
- thomasahle 12y agoIt's not a bad theory, but then again the `G` doesn't visually change, the `l` looks better horizontally, but worse vertically. Seems like a tie, at least at this resolution.
- panarky 12y agoAssume google.com serves 300 trillion impressions a year and clicking an ad generates $0.20 in revenue. The new logo would need to improve CTRs by 0.0000017% to generate a million dollars per year in new revenue.
- nilsimsa 12y agoA company is making too much money if they can waste half a year in discussing and testing something like this.
- untog 12y agoNot really. It takes very few resources to run an A/B test for six months. Set it up, check back for results six months later. Not that they necessarily did that here, but still.
- fallinghawks 12y ago
- 37prime 12y agoObviously the 1-pixel moves signify the shift in Google’s business strategy. Google is now politicaly one more pixel to the left and moving towards the lower upper class by one pixel. #OverAnalyzing
- ChrisGaudreau 12y agoYou'd make a fantastic English teacher.
- Pitarou 12y agoThis change totally sucks and, to me, it represents everything that's happened at Google that I don't like. Which is everything. Because I hate it when stuff changes.
- danford 12y agoI know! I can't even find the g and l anymore unless I move my eyes slightly down and to the left, how is this intuitive??
- mercer 12y agoI found this through /r/mildlyinteresting, and it just made me thing why exactly I find that subreddit, and these kinds of things, so interesting. Perhaps it's that it makes you think about mundane things that you normally don't give a second thought, or even notice?
- dkarapetyan 12y agoThis sounds like something out of the onion. I think this is how you become irrelevant. Didn't yahoo do something similar?
- oneweirdtrick 12y agoLife is just parody of itself these days. Edit: And yes, Yahoo did something similar: It turns out Mayer herself played a pivotal role, working with Yahoo's design team (and an intern) to design the new logo over the course of a single weekend. "I’m not a pro, but I know enough to be dangerous," Mayer says of her Adobe Illustrator know-how. "We knew we wanted a logo that reflected Yahoo — whimsical, yet sophisticated," she writes. "Modern and fresh, with a nod to our history." http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/5/4696274/yahoo-reveals-its-new-logo http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/5/4696274/yahoo-reveals-its-n...
- increment_i 12y agoArrgh! This is the third time I've run into this "story" in the last 24 hours - let it go, internet!
- SchizoDuckie 12y agoWhat is wrong with you HN visitors that this is on the FP?
- 8ig8 12y agoObviously a response to the DDG redesign.
- raldi 12y agoClearly this is the start of a boil-the-frog campaign that will see the "l" drop out of the logo completely as the "g" slides over to take its place. It'll happen so gradually over the course of the next eight months that most users won't even notice.
- animex 12y agoFixed.
- czottmann 12y agolol theyre new desing ppl are idots, Gogle is doomed etc. etc.
- pteredactyl 12y agoLOL
- alok-g 12y agoResisting the temptation to ask who is thing being upvoted, I'll ask a sibling question: Why are people upvoting this? Does this help someone in a meaningful fashion and in a way that worthy of bringing to everyone's attention?