4 ms·
> The jump is from "wealth inequality" to "power inequality." It's not clear that the former causes the latter. Well, there is that paper from Gilens and Page
by selmnoo 12y ago
> The jump is from "wealth inequality" to "power inequality." It's not clear that the former causes the latter.
Well, there is that paper from Gilens and Page that argues otherwise (http://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/Gilens%20homepage%20materials/Gilens%20and%20Page/Gilens%20and%20Page%202014-Testing%20Theories%203-7-14.pdf http://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/Gilens%20homepage%20materi...):
Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized
groups representing business interests have substantial independent
impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and
mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- alexeisadeski3 12y agoI'm sure it's the only paper ever written on the subject. I provided concrete examples of issues which impact all wealthy people in the US. If they could get behind any one policy with some degree of unanimity, surely it'd be the insanely progressive and aggressive nature of US taxation. But no, there's a study on some other issue which shows that they're so well organized as to have a huge impact on US policy. Right.