The article doesn't deliver on the sensationalist title. Here is all the evidence that this "insider" provides us: "TL: What triggered the decision to call the

The article doesn't deliver on the sensationalist title. Here is all the evidence that this "insider" provides us: "TL: What triggered the decision to call the game off? KG: I can only guess it was the trial lawyers. Why? Because they lost at every turn. If winning the debate wasn't an option, they were just going to call the game off. Which is apparently what they did." Glueck may be right, but this is nothing but speculation. Moreover, it is speculation unaided by any more information than the general public has. We all know that trial lawyers would, logically, dislike patent reform, so of course they're a natural suspect when it gets scuttled.