3 ms·
These benchmarks are already using OJ: https://github.com/thuva/json_serialization_benchmark/blob/master/Gemfile#L4 https://github.com/thuva/json_serialization_
by bretthopper 12y ago
These benchmarks are already using OJ: https://github.com/thuva/json_serialization_benchmark/blob/master/Gemfile#L4 https://github.com/thuva/json_serialization_benchmark/blob/m...
edit: although not sure it's being used properly yet
- mrinterweb 12y agoI forked and fixed the ActiveModel::Serializer and presenter examples to us Oj with MultiJson. I was unable to get rabl to work with the Oj engine for some reason. I didn't feel like spending any extra time to track it down. Anyway, from the benchmark, I was seeing that the Oj json serializer was approximately 3-10x faster than the normal to_json method. https://github.com/mrinterweb/json_serialization_benchmark https://github.com/mrinterweb/json_serialization_benchmark
- ttharma 12y agoIncluding Oj in Gemfile and not using it properly has caused some confusion. The original purpose of the benchmark was to test the relative performance of RABL, AMS, and presenters. In that case, the choice of the JSON library should not matter. Having said that, it would still be nice to see the best performance we can get out of the 3 tools we're benchmarking. But, we need to get Oj working with all 3 of them in order to avoid unfair comparison of performance.