Why do you say that? It seems clear to me it is. Do you disagree that A being caused by B usually means A and B correlated[0]? That's all that's necessary to sa

Why do you say that? It seems clear to me it is. Do you disagree that A being caused by B usually means A and B correlated[0]? That's all that's necessary to say correlation is evidence for causation. 0: I know there are some exceptions, but they seem rare. http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/26300/does-causation-imply-correlation http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/26300/does-causatio...