I find it funny how this article was 'written by a reporter'. The story was lifted from the Daily Mail, and it cites a quote from the Huffington Post. The quot

I find it funny how this article was 'written by a reporter'. The story was lifted from the Daily Mail, and it cites a quote from the Huffington Post. The quote that was in the Huffington Post was also in the Daily Mail article. So, at a guess, given that the story is from somewhere in Kent, the Daily Mail got there first. Or did they? Their pictures cite 'Rex Features', so I guess the story came through them. A quick Google confirms this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiYQbL0Kb1Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiYQbL0Kb1Q How can 'reporters' do no original reporting and call themselves 'reporters'? Do they just report what is on the internet? And not give the links they used? Incidentally the Dad has been making this newsworthy for quite a few years. There was the 16th birthday. Further back, the 13th birthday: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1181540/Smile-The-proud-father-took-pictures-children-EVERY-day--13-years.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1181540/Smile-The-pr... There may have been money with 'Rex Features', that wouldn't be such a bad 18th birthday gift, but that can't be included in the narrative as it spoils the story. Anyway, I just wish these 'reporters' did more than just copy and paste.