4 ms·
Egads. I tried to read the article. I really did. But it brought my chrome to its knees. Ran a quick javascript profile, and the minified function wa() was taki
by warfangle 12y ago
Egads. I tried to read the article. I really did. But it brought my chrome to its knees. Ran a quick javascript profile, and the minified function wa() was taking using 94.16%. Inspecting it, there's a for(;;){} loop that never hits a break condition.
This only makes me hate phys.org even more than I used to.
- ForHackernews 12y agoI use Ghostery, and I got a message: "It appears that you are currently using Ad Blocking software. What are the consequences? Click here to learn more." But at least the page loaded. If any phys.org admins are reading this: I don't mind seeing your ads; I do object to their tracking me.