3 ms·
be a bit more creative. It's known who the parent company is, so sue them. Since you're basically just suing for whatever you can get away with you should of co
by mixmax 12y ago
be a bit more creative. It's known who the parent company is, so sue them. Since you're basically just suing for whatever you can get away with you should of course go for the mother ship.
- glesica 12y agoBut there isn't always (or even usually) a "mothership" from what we've seen lately. Look at the Prenda Law saga (Ars Technica has some great write-ups). They can't even figure out who officially owns the company, it is almost entirely opaque. I think the problem is that corporate personhood has run completely amok. It is far too easy to invent a new corporate person with little or no visible or even provable connection to any natural person.
- cynicalkane 12y agoIt's worth pointing out that corporate personhood in the commercial sense is not the same as corporate personhood in the Citizens United sense. Governments are free to regulate how a 'corporate person' can come into existence and do business. They are just bad at it.
- glesica 12y agoAgreed, that is an important distinction to make.
- busterarm 12y agoOh Prenda Law. My favorite angle on their scam was when they started embedding malware into gay porn downloads to extort money out of them. I hope someone eventually gets to the bottom of who is behind that enterprise and they can be very publicly shamed and exposed.