4 ms·

I feel like ours does a bit better. Here are the sample searches they suggest: http://pedia.directededge.com/article/PHP http://pedia.directededge.com/article

by wheels 17y ago

I feel like ours does a bit better. Here are the sample searches they suggest: http://pedia.directededge.com/article/PHP http://pedia.directededge.com/article/PHP http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Flower http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Flower http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Bee http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Bee http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Albert_Einstein http://pedia.directededge.com/article/Albert_Einstein

bsaunder 17y ago
How so? I like their intersections (e.g. Abraham Lincoln, Robert Lee) and simple page layout.
- wheels 17y ago
  The intersections are interesting, but I feel like our engine does better at sussing out what something really is -- e.g. that PHP is a programming language, that Albert Einstein is a physicist.
  - bd 17y ago
    "sussing out what something really is" Wouldn't this be easier done by simply scraping "Category" links on the page? That's free human curated metadata right there.
    - wheels 17y ago
      We actually do that for generating tags, but those don't play into the recommendations that are generated.