3 ms·
It is fairly ironic that you use iPhone in your example considering that with side loading and permission over reach any talented hacker can access an Android p
by happyscrappy 12y ago
It is fairly ironic that you use iPhone in your example considering that with side loading and permission over reach any talented hacker can access an Android phone to the level you describe while you would almost have to be a nation state to pull it off on a non-jailbroken iPhone.
- Create 12y agoThen you may have missed a break in the third quarter of the telecast of Super Bowl XVIII by CBS. Advertising Age placed it on the top of its list of 50 greatest commercials.
- untog 12y agowith side loading and permission over reach a non-jailbroken iPhone You don't think it's a little unfair to compare a sideloaded (thus, compromised) Android phone with a non-compromised, non-jailbroken iPhone?
- happyscrappy 12y agoSide-loading and non-jailbroken are the defaults. Google is warning everyone to only download from the Play Store but few pay attention and everyone wants something for free.
- XorNot 12y agoYes because clearly no major company would want to spy on you through its official app...
- leoedin 12y agoEvery android phone I've owned has required me to check a box hidden in the settings before I could install from outwith the Play store. My current phone gives me an additional pop-up warning that this is a security risk which I have to agree to before it will enable side-loading. Ultimately you can't completely protect users from their own stupidity. You have to make the security vs usability tradeoff somewhere. I appreciate that my phone allows me to manually install applications - it is in fact one of the reasons I chose it.
- Karunamon 12y agoJailbroken and sideloaded APKs do not equate to "compromised".
- untog 12y agoThey do not equate to it, but they can cause it. In the example the OP was giving the phone would have been compromised by a side-loaded app. Quite possible.