3 ms·
You can get decent results on jpeg images using jpegtran, and if you don't mind progressive jpegs, you can get slightly smaller images with a progressive scan t
by tomkinstinch 12y ago
You can get decent results on jpeg images using jpegtran, and if you don't mind progressive jpegs, you can get slightly smaller images with a progressive scan table optimized for your images (determining the ideal scan order for your dataset is left as an exercise to the reader):
jpegtran -optimize -progressive -scans scan_table.txt image.jpg > image_optimized.jpg