4 ms·
Sure. Keep saying that when you are at a barrel of one of their guns. Remember that well: what gives them power is an unerring force to use deadly force at a w
by kefka 12y ago
Sure. Keep saying that when you are at a barrel of one of their guns.
Remember that well: what gives them power is an unerring force to use deadly force at a whim. "Make pot brownies using hash oil? No knock warrant with potential life sentence"...
- madaxe_again 12y agoWhat gives them power is the illusion of the ability to unilaterally use deadly force on a whim. No nation has a standing army or security force of sufficient dimension to quash a unilateral uprising through force alone. Sure, an individual ceasing to believe in the power of a state is a drop in the ocean, and ultimately will not end well for the individual in most cases. If a mass of individuals, however, cease believing, then the state's power evaporates. Witness every revolution, ever. It's not a question of the people assuming power, rather just the people refusing to grant the state power, en masse.
- Liesmith 12y agoNo, what gives them power is their very real ability to unilaterally use deadly force on a whim. What lets them maintain power is apathy on the part of the proletariat, their desire to be ruled, and individualized fear of authority. The illusion is actually that those in power can't hurt you, and it's something you only get when you unite with others and begin to equate the survival of the movement with your own survival. "I can't die, there's a thousand of us and only one of him." Also you talk about the state's power evaporating, but a shitload of peasant rebellions have been put down by those in charge. Like, almost all of them ever. Even the USA would have been utterly demolished if the Brits hadn't said "you know what, these colonials don't actually have enough value to fight over this. And they'll come crawling back anyway once they figure out they can't trade because Britannia rules the waves."