> You can't adopt any reforms unless those reforms fit into the narrowly-tailored practices of Scrum. I don't think Scrum is nearly that dogmatic in its postur

> You can't adopt any reforms unless those reforms fit into the narrowly-tailored practices of Scrum. I don't think Scrum is nearly that dogmatic in its posture or that inflexible in its prescriptions, but even if I'm wrong, maybe you should consider adopting Scrum-but-without-the-rigidity-you-think-it-has. Of course you can do as you please; you don't need a new capitalized term to make that true.