3 ms·
How does this compare with jpegmini[0]? It's actually one of the best compressors I know (and use) EDIT: Compressor.io (lossless): Before 4.72 MB | After 4.7
by chewxy 12y ago
How does this compare with jpegmini[0]? It's actually one of the best compressors I know (and use)
EDIT:
Compressor.io (lossless):
Before 4.72 MB | After 4.72 MB
Compressor.io (lossy):
Before 4.72 MB | After 1.27 MB
JpegMini (lossless):
Before: 4.72 MB | After 1.3 MB
Test image: http://imgur.com/gbOCJxX http://imgur.com/gbOCJxX
[0] http://www.jpegmini.com http://www.jpegmini.com
- xooyoozoo 12y agoJpegMini claims to be perceptually lossless, not mathematically lossless.
- tagawa 12y agoLooks like it depends on the image. Image1 reduction: Compressor.io 28.67% | JpegMini 34.35% Image2 reduction: Compressor.io 69.55% | JpegMini 55.41% If I had to choose, I'd say the visual quality of JpegMini is fractionally better, but it's hardly perceptible to my eye - they both produce incredible results.
- rafeed 12y agoBesides offering lossless quality images, JPEGmini allows a much larger file size. Compressor.io only appears to allow 10MB files, which if you're trying to use it for photography, it won't be very useful because the jpeg's produced by a Canon 5D Mark III are about 20MB-30MB in size. It is also only web based, whereas JPEGmini has a native client. Compressor.io looks promising though.