Why assume when you can read plaintiff's description of events in the suit[0], which directly challenges your assumptions and contains some extremely damning ev

Why assume when you can read plaintiff's description of events in the suit[0], which directly challenges your assumptions and contains some extremely damning evidence? [0]: http://www.scribd.com/doc/225491347/ZeniMax-v-Oculus-Complaint-As-Filed-21-May-2014 http://www.scribd.com/doc/225491347/ZeniMax-v-Oculus-Complai...