5 ms·
Digg.git
- biohacker42 17y agoI'm conflicted about flagging digg and upvoting git.
- TheElder 17y agoI think you shouldn't worry about digg and upvote the article if you think the content is worth the upvote. I have never used git, but articles like this are pushing me towards it.
- RyanMcGreal 17y agoI started using git not too long ago and it feels really intuitive - more sensible on the command line than most GUIs I've used.
- sgrove 17y agoThere's not too much in here that's going to be news to people. About the only interesting part is the reduction in merge times and how well it's scaled for them. But two sentences makes for a short article. Still, it's nice to hear concrete figures about 1-2 days dropping down to ~30 minutes. Glad they shared.
- calvin 17y agoSummary of article: Git is awesome. It "reduce[d] the time our integration process took from days to minutes." And it scales better than SVN.
- chrischen 17y agoOh and I thought it was going to be about the new .git tld ...
- mburns 17y agoNative, version-controlled websites!
- vlucas 17y agoIn the past 3 weeks I have had a very similar experience. I switched my personal projects to git just before starting a new job where the dev team used git extensively. Coming from SVN, it quite honestly amazed me how quickly I was able to just create a new branch, make a small fix, and push it live without affecting any other changes that other devs or I had made. If you haven't checked git out, I highly suggest you do so. All the hype is annoying at times, but it really does live up to at least most of it.
- mogston 17y agoDoes Eclipse support GIT yet?
- jedberg 17y agoYet another feature Digg has copied from reddit: http://code.reddit.com http://code.reddit.com :)
- pwmanagerdied 17y agoThat's frankly idiotic and unconstructive.