3 ms·
.com is owned by a single company(and other top level domains owned by other companies), why shouldn't more companies own other top level domains? The fact sin
by forgottenpass 12y ago
.com is owned by a single company(and other top level domains owned by other companies), why shouldn't more companies own other top level domains?
The fact single companies manage TLDs doesn't factor into my thought process on how we should manage the TLD namespace.
It sounds like your problem is really with Verisign et al., perhaps the fight you're looking for is how individual gTLDs are managed in the first place, not assuming that part of the model is fixed and exploding the namespace in some bizarro business fairness.
- genericuser 12y agoI would simply like to see more companies competing in the space of providing registration of domains for their top level domain than currently exist. As far as I am concerned I see no reason not to have thousands or millions of top level domains. I am a believer that with ample time and more options we will see the false assumption that everything is a .com become less widespread. (Although this belief is largely based on wishful thinking, I will admit)