It is not required to disguise yourself as another to make people think. Parodies in the past did not depend on fooling people as to the source of words. It i

It is not required to disguise yourself as another to make people think. Parodies in the past did not depend on fooling people as to the source of words. It is enough to conjure up a thought of the parties parodied, through use of similar symbols/words/methods. One doesn't have to actually pretend to be them in an exact way for parody to hit its mark. Nor in the past have I seen great parodies do this.