3 ms·
Slightly off-topic rant. Can someone explain to me why it is necessary to have the entire webpage refuse to render (white page (with scrollbar, "amusingly" eno
by TheLoneWolfling 12y ago
Slightly off-topic rant.
Can someone explain to me why it is necessary to have the entire webpage refuse to render (white page (with scrollbar, "amusingly" enough)) if JS is disabled?
As far as I can tell, the entire website is slapped into a series of "<meta property=" tags and then converted to HTML using Javascript (from another site, no less!)
Whatever happened to progressive enhancement? Say... Actually using HTML and CSS? Maybe converted from markup on the server, or when the post is created?
There are any number of reasons not to do things this way, and any number of alternatives that have advantages over this.
- aroch 12y agoI too find this annoying, its apparently a "feature" using squarespace. Even squarespace's own website won't load without JS enabled.
- parallelist 12y agoPeople still care about this? I thought JS was just an accepted requirement of browsing the web these days.
- click170 12y agoYou thought wrong.
- parallelist 12y agoThank you
- dredmorbius 12y agoThis absolutely. I flag such submissions (this one included).