4 ms·
The point of the comparison isn't to compare the two products against each other, but rather to suggest that the Surface is more power/technology for less weigh
by JimmaDaRustla 12y ago
The point of the comparison isn't to compare the two products against each other, but rather to suggest that the Surface is more power/technology for less weight as a portable device.
- dublinben 12y agoPutting two objects on a scale is pretty much the most literal way to compare them. You're being far too generous in your interpretation here.
- JimmaDaRustla 12y agoNo, I'm not. I was watching the live feeds - they even put both iPad plus MacBook Air on the scale versus the Surface Pro with the pure intention that one would carry both laptop and tablet on a daily basis, and that they are aiming to have the Surface be a full solution in a single, smaller form factor. Again, it is pretty clear that the intent wasn't to present the weight of product A vs product B, but rather the weight of one solution versus others. Edit: Otherwise, the comparison is completely redundant - different form factors, different materials, difference screen sizes, etc. Even the whole theme of the event was that the want the Surface to replace laptops. "You've been told to buy a tablet, but you know you need a laptop. Today we're going to focus on that, and only on that, taking that conflict away."
- rbanffy 12y agoI would expect a brand new just launched device with the most recent technology available would stack up favorably against an older device that uses a different form factor and has not been significantly updated in about a year. It's like saying your V-8 Corvette is lighter than your 3 year old V-8 Dodge Challenger. I would be very surprised if it weren't.