4 ms·
The whole story seems to repeatedly wave the arms and shout: "Hey, Twitter! Hey, Facebook! Here we are! We know how to do this! Hire us, hire us, hire us!!!".
by sabon 17y ago
The whole story seems to repeatedly wave the arms and shout:
"Hey, Twitter! Hey, Facebook! Here we are! We know how to do this! Hire us, hire us, hire us!!!".
At least that's how I read the story. And I'm quite convinced it's their intent.
Which shouldn't be a bad thing too.
- brk 17y agoSo?
- ivankirigin 17y agoThat's a pretty bold statement, and on the face of it incorrect. Our messages was first and foremost to assure users that their money is still there. And then we made a comment on the market that we failed to succeed in.
- sabon 17y agoWell, of course customers' money is the most important thing, no doubt about it. But it struck me that you mentioned several times in the article that you know what and how to do, you just don't have the leverage of being the main body. Why would you deny it? Is it something bad? I don't think so. Would you refuse if Twitter or Facebook approached you with a decent offer?
- ivankirigin 17y agoWriting a blog post like this would be a lame way to get the attention of any future employer - that's why I'm complaining. You're questioning my motivations, which you have no insight into. Whether I would choose one thing or another is irrelevant. If I wanted to get the company bought, or get a job, I'd just have a conversation with any of our awesome advisers to get directly in touch with pretty much anyone.