3 ms·
(Note, this is just my take on it - I don't know its real intent, but this is what seemed feasible and fun to me when I tried it out) To me, the entertaining p
by EdgarVerona 12y ago
(Note, this is just my take on it - I don't know its real intent, but this is what seemed feasible and fun to me when I tried it out)
To me, the entertaining part was that you couldn't see or use the non-visible sections unless you rotated them into view: that is, unless you altered your original mix.
It makes the Rubik's Cube analogy come together (because without something to force you to vary it, it'd just be freely inputting what you wanted: and at that point, it'd just be a bad mixer interface).
I don't think it was meant to be convenient to use, but instead entertaining and emergent via treating it more like a Rubik's Cube than a mixer.
- skeoh 12y agoI honestly had no idea the sections could be rotated like a Rubiks Cube until I read your comment. The cube can be rotated in its entirety by dragging the empty space around it -- as such, you can see and use non-visible sections without altering the drum pattern.