Surely that shouldn't matter? As long as the subscriber can prove their network is open or multi-user (which is easily done). That would make it necessary to pr

Surely that shouldn't matter? As long as the subscriber can prove their network is open or multi-user (which is easily done). That would make it necessary to prove the specific individual committed whatever crime is alleged. To my mind, given the prevalence of malware, compromises to security - that should be the case anyway, after all if malware does something illegal on your PC, why should you be liable? Expecting John "But it said I was infected and should click the EXE to clean it!" Doe to be responsible for their computer's security in this day and age is .. laughable and unreasonable.