3 ms·
I have not but other open source projects have similar issues when dealing with copyrighted files. OpenJailbreak, for example, downloads copyrighted firmwares a
by jevinskie 12y ago
I have not but other open source projects have similar issues when dealing with copyrighted files. OpenJailbreak, for example, downloads copyrighted firmwares and then applies patches locally. They did not want to host modified Apple binaries in their open source project. They even went the extra mile and developed a library that can partially extract zip files served over HTTP so the entire firmware would not be downloaded. [0]
I agree that a lot of hard work has gone into the ROM reversing. I also cannot dispute that it is fascinating! I just wish the developers could have gone about the project in a manner that would not besmirch the project with copyright concerns.
[0]: https://www.openjailbreak.org/projects/libpartialzip-1-0/repository https://www.openjailbreak.org/projects/libpartialzip-1-0/rep...
- serf 12y agoRight, but all you're arguing for is a shift of legal responsibility on a project that's unlikely to be bothered legally, which will in-turn add another meta layer of development for the people involved(let's build a patcher). It's illegal, yes. It's also : 1) a massive PR blow to sue fans who have taken an interest 2) a legal money-sink on decades old property that isn't producing less profit as a result. For all you know, this github could have generated revenue for Nintendo through the revitalization of interest in the franchise using nostalgia against current day software developers...
- jevinskie 12y agoAgreed, dotting the Is and crossing the Ts isn't what the developers want to spend their time on. I've unflagged the article.