Yeah, that may have started out with somewhat noble intentions. But still: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empire http://en.wikipedia.or

Yeah, that may have started out with somewhat noble intentions. But still: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empire http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empir... The legal fiction of the early Empire (in which the emperor was but the first among equals) was disposed of; the emperors, beginning with Aurelian, openly styled themselves as dominus et deus, lord and god, titles appropriate for a slave towards his master. An elaborate court ceremonial was developed, and obsequious flattery became the order of the day. Under Diocletian, the flow of direct requests to the emperor was rapidly reduced and soon ceased altogether. No other form of direct access replaced them, and the emperor received only information that was filtered through his courtiers. Official cruelty, supporting extortion and corruption, may also have become more commonplace. While the scale, complexity, and violence of government were unmatched, the emperors lost control over their whole realm insofar as that control came increasingly to be wielded by anyone who paid for it. Meanwhile the richest senatorial families, immune from most taxation, engrossed more and more of the available wealth and income, while also becoming divorced from any tradition of military excellence.