4 ms·
I can't help but wonder why Google thinks links from OP's site are "unnatural" (assuming they're all natural). E.g. is this a consequence of allowing do-follow
by neurobro 12y ago
I can't help but wonder why Google thinks links from OP's site are "unnatural" (assuming they're all natural). E.g. is this a consequence of allowing do-follow links in comments - and if so, does vigilant moderation make a difference? Or perhaps an indication that the site was compromised and there are pages of spam hidden off in a corner somewhere?
- singhabhishek25 12y agoI have one Suggestion for Matt Cutts, that instead of penalizing and killing everyone, why not you are neglecting the bad links automatically and do not add value to the website for that particular link, which I believe that would be your step after disavow request. Here everyone is going into trouble and has to suffer a lot, so it would be better to neglect that link if it looks unnatural instead of penalizing for the same. Like this there would be no risk of penalizing wrong website. Website can continue getting traffic from the link and no one will fear from linking with anyone.