3 ms·
You're getting downvoted, but I think you have a point. Any attempts to enact type-checking in a language that doesn't require it is doomed to failure. You'll g
by yen223 12y ago
You're getting downvoted, but I think you have a point. Any attempts to enact type-checking in a language that doesn't require it is doomed to failure. You'll get all the safety of a dynamic language, with the flexibility of a typed language.
- frowaway001 12y ago> You'll get all the safety of a dynamic language, with the flexibility of a typed language. That sounds a pretty good description of Go, so I'm wondering what his point is in the first place.