3 ms·
I think it's optimistic to think that the two axes would be respected. People could still go for the heavier downvote out of spite. Slashdot tried to address th
by andreasvc 12y ago
I think it's optimistic to think that the two axes would be respected. People could still go for the heavier downvote out of spite. Slashdot tried to address this by being selective about who gets downmodding rights. It's not obvious that making things less simple works better.
- gojomo 12y agoIt may be optimistic; many optimistic things with only a small chance of working are still worth a try. (Assuming the worst, and designing only for the worst, then ensures the worst.) That 'spite' you mention isn't a constant across all communities, across all time: it grows with cycles of negative, stinging punishment-feedback. (The study which started this thread was suggestive of that, regardless of its other limitations.) I strongly suspect each of the following is true: • threads on certain contentious subjects have lots of competitive and retaliatory downvotes, driven from the impulses "I can't let only these favored comments sink/fade" and "if those partisans are downvoting me, I'll downvote them" • that habit/mood, once learned, spills over into other threads, to the detriment of discourse and positive/productive feelings A separate axis for disagreement might catch some of that and express it where it does less spite-generation.