41 ms·
With that headline I was expecting the author to put forth a number or at least assert that it couldn't be 1.7 million.
by pbreit 13y ago
With that headline I was expecting the author to put forth a number or at least assert that it couldn't be 1.7 million.
- kevingadd 13y agoThe whole point of the article is that there's no credible number because the government has no way to know what was stolen.
- lazylizard 13y agoa little bit curious. i'd think that is a correct assumption to be working with -> he accessed N documents, assume they're all compromised.