3 ms·
Why do you keep trying to detail the conversation, beta? Let's recap. 1. You asked for some other examples of disturbing BJP policies. You didn't qualify that
by anu_gupta 12y ago
Why do you keep trying to detail the conversation, beta?
Let's recap.
1. You asked for some other examples of disturbing BJP policies. You didn't qualify that in any way.
2. You get provided with an example
3. You're then all "Oh, but other people do that too, why single out my guy?"
4. Your attempts to move the goalpost is called out.
5. You then decide to use the word "fallacy" incorrectly and continue to try to derail.
I think Gandhi was a shit. I think Modi is a shit. I think people like you, who continue to prop up the corrupt power structures in India are directly responsible for the mess that India is in. And I think it's reprehensible that all you can do is try to protect a corrupt, bigoted shit with the defence that someone else was a shit too.
In future, choose your words and questions more carefully, and don't cry when you get an answer that you specifically asked for.
- discardorama 12y agoNow let me educate you a little, mummy. When you say, "I find X disturbing", that means you are saying "X is not the norm; and I find that deviation upsetting". I am saying that _every_ major political party has that norm in India; otherwise, the 100+ years old laws against homosexuality would not have survived. If you find BJP's stance against homosexuality 'disturbing', then you must be having apoplectic fits at the Congress Party, which has governed India for 50+ years. If they were for gay rights, why didn't _they_ do something? "I think Gandhi was a shit. I think Modi is a shit." ... LOL. Instead of bleating like a goat about the problems, offer a solution. The main reason people support Modi is that he can govern; and he has shown that in Gujarat. However low the bar may be, he is the only one of the current crop of "leaders" who has cleared it. People want good governance, not platitudes. And sure as hell they don't want weed-smoking pseudo-intellectuals who couldn't survive a day doing real field work.