3 ms·
You choose to ignore my point. Obviously you know about "perfect" and "better than gmail", right?
by pdx 12y ago
You choose to ignore my point. Obviously you know about "perfect" and "better than gmail", right?
- tptacek 12y agoThen Gmail is more secure than this service, because Google's servers are pinned in browsers, so you can't compromise them by compromising any CA in the CA hierarchy.
- fareastcoast 12y agoI don't really agree with this. Gmail is compromised by the NSA sending one email to Google.
- prayag 12y agoI hear you dude but this is clearly not "end-to-end" encryption. End-to-end has a very specific meaning. End-to-end encryption means a messaging system in which one or more compromised node from node 1 to N-1 could not eavesdrop on the message. In this solution if you get access to node 1 (the server), you get access to the message. It's binary. There's either end-to-end encryption or there isn't. This one isn't.