From the article: > CREDO Mobile, a new addition to this year’s report, demonstrated through its exemplary policies that it is possible for a telecom to adopt

From the article: > CREDO Mobile, a new addition to this year’s report, demonstrated through its exemplary policies that it is possible for a telecom to adopt best practices when it comes to transparency and resistance to government demands. I'd never heard of Credo Mobile before. Regardless of the intentions of Credo, since they appear to be leasing Sprint's towers, doesn't that ultimately put Credo's customers at the whim of Sprint in terms of who gets wiretapped / transparency reports / etc? Or is it possible for a tenant on the infrastructure to be reasonably assured that outsiders can't intrude into their communications. I know very little about it, but what I've seen of cell network security research, makes me assume that no such security exists for tenants leasing towers.