4 ms·
I just believe in data and not articles, here is something to check. http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Muslim=40%25%2B&Muslim=20-40%25 http://ibn.gramener.com/live?M
by abhidilliwal 12y ago
I just believe in data and not articles, here is something to check.
http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Muslim=40%25%2B&Muslim=20-40%25 http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Muslim=40%25%2B&Muslim=20-40%25
- mxfh 12y agoWhat are you trying to show by this, if you don't give anything to compare it to? try: http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Muslim=40%25%2B http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Muslim=40%25%2B or hindi: http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Hindi-speaking=Hindi http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Hindi-speaking=Hindi vs non-hindi http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Hindi-speaking=Rest http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Hindi-speaking=Rest Also can someone explain what bi-polar means in this context (best guess so far, single party majority in voting district)? It looks very distinct: http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Bi-polar=Bi-polar http://ibn.gramener.com/live?Bi-polar=Bi-polar
- DangerousPie 12y agoI assume this supposed to show that his party did well in districts with large Muslim populations? I am not sure what you are trying to say with this. If you are claiming that this means that he can't be that anti-Muslim then I think that's far from the only possible explanation. For one, you are showing every district with at least 20% Muslim population. So even if every one of them had voted for the opposition, the 80% non-Muslims would have still decided the election.