3 ms·
This is the comment you should have made originally. Your initial comment comes across as little more than an unsuccessful attempt at a funny one-liner. Here's
by biot 12y ago
This is the comment you should have made originally. Your initial comment comes across as little more than an unsuccessful attempt at a funny one-liner. Here's what pg has to say[0] about those kinds of comments:
"The most dangerous form of stupid comment is not the long but
mistaken argument, but the dumb joke. [...] Whatever the cause,
stupid comments tend to be short. And since it's hard to write a
short comment that's distinguished for the amount of information it
conveys, people try to distinguish them instead by being funny."
Or did you intend your initial comment to be serious? If so, perhaps you can explain how you believe that working in vim is tantamount to solitary confinement. Is someone forcing you to be alone while you use a text editor? In other words, are you being actively prevented from working alongside other people? Does using vim isolate you from other sensory input?
[0] http://www.paulgraham.com/hackernews.html http://www.paulgraham.com/hackernews.html
- jqm 12y agoStupid comments might tend to be short. But all short comments are not stupid. Sometimes it is possible to say much with humor in very few words. Thank you for providing a guys opinion. But I don't happen to be religious.
- biot 12y ago> Sometimes it is possible to say much with humor in very few words. I completely agree with that, though I disagree that you said much in your original comment (or that it was funny) which is why I think that your subsequent comment explaining what you meant would have been better to start with. Your original comment mentioned nothing about working remotely in isolation or less severe version of the symptoms, and "the solitary confinement of VIM" is a pretty absurd statement to make unless you explain what you mean.
- jqm 12y agoIt's been interesting to watch the votes on the original comment over the past couple of hours. It has received no less than 10 votes with a fairly even split and a slight favor towards the positive. Some people apparently feel exactly what I'm talking about. Some don't. I think maybe we are seeing breakdown of people who have put in serious alone time with an editor VS those who have not. I could be wrong about this. But I don't feel the need to explain. You understand or you don't. I'm sorry if the comment caused you consternation. Please be assured this was not my intention.
- biot 12y agoNo consternation felt here; my intent is to encourage higher quality comments. Your follow-up comment was quality as it contained relevant details your initial comment lacked.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- jqm 12y agoI respect your opinion and am sorry you didn't understand my initial comment. Best.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]