4 ms·
I'm sure this is great walkthrough. Although I'd like it if there weren't headlines like "FP explained". I realize this may be pedantic, but If I've learned a
by platz 13y ago
I'm sure this is great walkthrough. Although I'd like it if there weren't headlines like "FP explained".
I realize this may be pedantic, but If I've learned anything about FP, the term means different things things to different people, and a statement which makes universal claim about FP In General then will misrepresent the other flavors of FP.
At least qualify it somehow. Actually, why not just say something like "Terminal-Based Game Walkthrough in Clojure"?
- phren0logy 13y agoMaybe I'm a "glass is half full" kind of guy, but explaining one kind of FP (rather than all of them) still counts as "FP explained" in my book.
- ch4s3 13y agoI agree. I think of it like 'x' explained (from 'y' perspective or with reference to 'y'). e.g. 'Woodworking Explained, master the lathe"