2 ms·

> I'd rather see my positive moral get challenged, then no morals be maintained. If I remember correctly, Mozilla was very careful not to promise never to impl

> I'd rather see my positive moral get challenged, then no morals be maintained. If I remember correctly, Mozilla was very careful not to promise never to implement H.264, for this very reason. Anyway, if you really want a browser that has promised never to be non-free in anyway, and which you can count on to keep that promise, just use Iceweasel. It's essentially the same as Firefox with no proprietary blobs (Flash, DRM, etc.).

drdaeman 12y ago
> It's essentially the same as Firefox with no proprietary blobs (Flash, DRM, etc.). I had always thought Iceweasel was about Firefox branding (i.e. trademark, not copyright) issue. Mozilla had issues with some custom Firefox builds, so they asked to not call "Firefox" anything that wasn't build by them. Maybe I'm unaware of something, but at least I hadn't seen any Flash or DRM blobs in Firefox packaging. Blobs are Chrome/Chromium distinction. Oh, well, but if they're adding DRM to Firefox, guess that would be a new distinction between it and Iceweasel.