5 ms·
We're saying the same thing. I understand that children need to understand the underlying concepts. I'm saying there are already well established methods for
by rplst8 12y ago
We're saying the same thing. I understand that children need to understand the underlying concepts. I'm saying there are already well established methods for teaching those.
Waving a hand and saying the "old way" is simply an algorithm and a poor method because it glosses over the details is like saying teaching someone how to use a calculator will make them forget how math works.
That common core method for subtracting 12 from 32 definitely doesn't teach you anything about how or why it works.
- unclebucknasty 12y ago>That common core method for subtracting 12 from 32 definitely doesn't teach you anything about how or why it works. That was a point I made elsewhere on this thread. When helping my second-grader with her homework, it sometimes seems that they are just changing what the student is required to memorize (and also increasing the volume), without necessarily imparting additional understanding. That problem relies on what they call the "Add it Up" method, and it is specifically a technique with which I've helped my daughter. I observed that kids can completely learn the method and ace a test without understanding the concepts behind it.
- DanBC 12y agoThere is also pretty good evidence that the old methods did not promote understanding. > That common core method for subtracting 12 from 32 definitely doesn't teach you anything about how or why it works. You do not understand what it is trying to teach. It is teaching children that taking one number from another can be done using columns, but it can also be done in your head by breaking big numbers down into small numbers and counting up.