That was a very interesting read. I always thought NaN != NaN was because it's a class of values (there are many binary representations that are NaN, as it just

That was a very interesting read. I always thought NaN != NaN was because it's a class of values (there are many binary representations that are NaN, as it just requires an all-ones exponent and a mantissa that isn't all-zeroes) but I guess I was considering it too simplistically.