4 ms·
Sadly, the text of the "right" allows suits against the search engines, and it's easier to find and sue major search engines than the owner of every site return
by brownbat 12y ago
Sadly, the text of the "right" allows suits against the search engines, and it's easier to find and sue major search engines than the owner of every site returned by results.
http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox/right-to-be-forgotten?em_x=22 http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox/righ...
Safe harbor is an endangered species.
Google and Yahoo should spend a day blurring out every name in search results to illustrate the danger of the ruling.
- us0r 12y agoIs it blurring out names or removing results? I'm under the impression they need to remove the page from the results. The shocking thing about this is the actual producers of the data got an explicit walk free pass? I just don't see how that makes any sense.
- brownbat 12y agoYeah, the actual one removes results. There are examples where they just return blank results pages for some people's names. I just thought the blurred names would be a fun trick that would still let people get to content for a day, might raise awareness without alienating as many users.